Typical and Nontypical White-tailed Antlers

Typical and Nontypical White-tailed Antlers

We have talked about normal and abnormal points, but today we are discussing typical and nontypical white-tailed deer antlers. Every set of antlers is classifed as typical or nontypical and can be scored as either a typical or non-typical rack. This may sound confusing, but there are advantages to scoring certain sets of antlers one way or the other.

For the purposed of Boone & Crockett Club, typical antlers are those that look like “normal” buck antlers, such as a 10-point buck that has 5-points per side with matched G1s, G2s, G3s, and G4s. Typical means the antlers have antler points in the typical locations where points are found and the conformation on the buck’s rack are typical in nature.

Typical and Nontypical White-tailed Antlers
Typical White-tailed Deer Antlers

Nontypical white-tailed buck antlers, on the other hand, are sets of antlers that do not look normal. These can be slightly odd looking, such as having unmatched points (say 4-points on one side and 6 on the other) or can be a totally freakish buck with 34 points going in every direction with points off points.

Typical and Nontypical White-tailed Antlers
Nontypical White-tailed Deer Antlers

The most important thing to remember regarding scoring both typical and nontypical antlers is that having a typical, symmetrical frame is very important for the net score. When scoring a typical 8-point, for example, each point is measured and compared to the paired point on the other side of the rack. The left G1 is compared to the right G1, the left G2 to the right G2, and G3 to G3. The difference between in length between G1s is where deductions take place. The same is true for circumferences (H) as well as the main beams.

For the gross score, all the point lengths, inside spread, beam lengths, and circumferences add up for total inches. To get the net score on a typical rack, the differences in paired points, circumferences, and beam lengths are deducted. If all the points are the same length, all the circumferences are the same, and the beams are the same length, the gross and net score will be identical because there are no deductions.

For the gross score on a nontypical white-tailed deer rack, all the point lengths, inside spread, beam lengths, and circumferences add up for total inches. To get the net score on a nontypical rack, the differences in paired points, circumferences, and beam lengths are deducted. Abnormal points still add to the net score on a nontypical rack.

Typical and Nontypical White-tailed Antlers

If there is an abnormal point on a typical set of antlers, then that point will be deducted from the net score. Why? Because it is abnormal. It does not matter if it’s a “kicker” off another point or a buck that has 5-points on one side and 6 on the other. Five of the points will be typical because they are matched, but the 6th point will be “abnormal” so to speak. In some cases, good judgement may be needed to properly score your buck and determine which points are normal and paired and which ones are abnormal.



Related Posts:
  • Scoring a Buck Typical Versus Non-Typical
  • Scoring White-tailed Deer Using Boone & Crockett Method
  • Mass and Beam Measurements
  • Stages of Antler Development in White-tailed Deer
  • Measuring Point Length in White-tailed Deer
  • Oklahoma Record Book Whitetail Bucks
  • Three White-tailed Bucks Locked by Antlers
  • Big Buck Found at Lake Waco in Texas
  • When Do White-tailed Bucks Shed Their Antlers
  • Hunting for Shed Deer Antlers


  • 1 Comment(s)

    1. What determines whether a buck is scored typical or non-typical? Is there a maximum amount of deductions allowed for typicals? thank you

      Ralph Barnhill | Jun 10, 2008 | Reply

    4 Trackback(s)

    1. Jan 17, 2008: from Mass and Beam Measurements | BUCK MANAGER
    2. Jan 18, 2008: from Scoring White-tailed Deer Using Boone & Crockett Method | BUCK MANAGER
    3. Jan 23, 2008: from Measuring Point Length in White-tailed Deer | BUCK MANAGER
    4. Jun 10, 2008: from Scoring a Buck Typical Versus Non-Typical | Buck Manager

    Post a Comment