White-tailed Deer – A Success Story in Texas

White-tailed Deer - A Success Story in Texas

At one point in the late 19th century, white-tailed deer nearly disappeared from the Texas landscape. Over harvest and alteration of natural plant communities had reduced or eliminated deer numbers across much of Texas. Protective measures were taken, including the first deer seasons, harvest limits, and the establishment of the state game warden service.

This protection from exploitation was accompanied by adaptation of deer to altered landscapes and widespread restocking by the state wildlife department. From their near disappearance over 100-years ago, white-tailed deer have been restored to most areas they previously occupied and have even expanded their range into historically unoccupied areas of the state. The restoration of the whitetail is a wildlife management success story in Texas and many other states that went through similar transitions.

White-tailed Deer - A Success Story in Texas

The current status of white-tailed deer populations nationally is also a testament to the resiliency and adaptability of this species. White-tailed deer can thrive side-by-side with human populations through urban and suburban areas throughout the United States. The adaptability of white-tailed deer and the desire of people to live and work in areas that retain green spaces have resulted in deer overabundance in many areas.

White-tailed Deer - A Success Story in Texas

Not only do deer represent a success story for the species, but they represent part of the culture in many rural areas. White-tailed deer now account for a significant portion of local economies in Texas and much of small-town America. With significant biological, economic, and social importance, hopefully the white-tailed deer will always have a place to call home.

Too Many Deer – Problems With Overabundance

Too Many Deer - Problems With Overabundance

The white-tailed deer is one of the most popular and recognizable species of wildlife in the eastern half of the United States. They are a significant recreational resource among hunters and those who just like to watch and enjoy wildlife. White-tailed deer are also an important economic resource to many rural land owners who lease hunting rights on their property and businesses that profit from traveling hunters.

Whitetail, as they are commonly referred to, are also an increasingly common animal in and around many urban and suburban communities, often in overabundance. An overabundant deer herd can be described as one that exceeded the capacity of the native plant community. Overabundant deer herds can result in concerns for the deer, for the native plant communities, for urban landscapes and also the health, safety, and economic well-being of local communities.

Neighborhoods across the U.S. are beginning to confront these issues which have been a concern of communities in the northeastern states for several decades. As overabundant white-tailed deer reduce the health of native plant communities, other wildlife species become less common. Having too many deer causes health problems within the herd such as starvation, increased numbers of parasites, and more disease.

Overabundant deer herds cause concerns such as:

— Automobile accidents from deer collisions or drivers trying to avoid deer.

— Severe damage to landscaping.

— Buck deer that are unafraid of people can be dangerous during the breeding season (rut).

— Increased numbers of disease causing agents such as ticks carrying Lyme’s disease.

— Deer feeding resulting in more reproduction and further aggravation of all overabundant deer conerns.

Too Many Deer - Problems With Overabundance

Solutions for controlling deer numbers:

Within urban and suburban areas, controlling whitetail deer numbers can difficult. To control any population, one must either reduce the current population or curtail reproduction. This can be difficult to accomplish because of conflicts within communities. For every person that sees too many deer as a problem, there is someone that does not want to trap, remove, harvest, or otherwise “impact” the animal.

Texas Considers Hunting Regulation Changes

Texas Considers Hunting Regulation Changes

State wildlife officials are considering proposing hunting regulation changes that would benefit young hunters by reducing the minimum draw weight for bows used in hunting and dropping the minimum age for certification in the state’s hunter education program.

The modifications were part of a package of potential rules changes Texas Parks and Wildlife Department wildlife division staff are considering recommending for 2008. This month, wildlife division staff briefed the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission’s regulations committee on the potential proposals.

Official proposals for changes in Texas hunting and fishing regulations will be announced in January. Any changes adopted would take effect September 1, 2008.

Texas is one of only 14 states where bowhunters are limited to using bows that have a minimum peak draw weight of 40 pounds; all other states with archery-only hunting seasons have lower or no minimum draw weights.

That 40-pound draw weight — basically, like lifting a 40-pound sack of sand with two fingers — was designed to limit archers to using only bows that wildlife managers figured produced enough arrow velocity and energy to be effective on white-tailed deer.

And the minimum, which has been in place for decades, applied to equipment used for bowhunting any game animal except squirrel.

But the draw-weight requirement meant a lot of young people and many women were shut out of bowhunting because they didn’t have the upper-body strength to draw a 40-pound bow.

Improved Technology

Today, with much advanced-technology archery equipment, bows with less than a 40-pound draw weight can be effective in some situations. Because of those changes in bow technology, and its policy of working to increase participation in hunting, Texas officials are considering lowering the draw weight requirement to 30 pounds, or maybe even eliminating it as have 15 other states.

“Lowering the minimum draw weight would increase (hunting) opportunity for young people and people with smaller frames,” Mike Berger, Director of the TPWD’s Wildlife Division told the regulations committee as he presented potential hunting regulation proposals for the coming year.

Big Whitetail Bucks Harvested in 2007

Increasing opportunity for young hunters is part of the reasoning behind TPWD staff considering proposing lowering of the minimum age for Hunter Education certification.

Currently, only persons 12 years old or older can receive certification for taking and completing the state-authorized Hunter Education course.

All persons born on or after September 2, 1971, and at least 17 years old are required to have taken and passed a Hunter Education course before they can legally hunt. A one-time, one-year Hunter Education exemption/deferral is available for $10.

Age Could Drop To 9

In Texas, hunters 12 to 16 years old are required to possess the Hunter Education certification if they are not under the direct control of an adult hunter.

People younger than 12 can take the state-recognized Hunter Education course, but can’t be issued the certification, which is valid for life.

TPWD is considering proposing to drop the certification age to 9 years, the same as the minimum age for the Texas Youth Hunting Program.

The bow draw-weight issue and the hunter education age requirement were the only two hunting regulation topics with state-wide implications presented at the regulations committee briefing.

Other than opening brief seasons for mule deer in five counties in the Panhandle, no other potential major changes in hunting seasons or bag limits or other hunting regulations for 2008 were offered by the wildlife division.

_________________________

By SHANNON TOMPKINS
Houston Chronicle

License Sales Decline, Women Hunters Increase

License Sales Decline, Woman Hunters Increase
When Brianne Stewart, 12, of West Newton, shot her first deer this fall she joined a sorority of hunters who are bucking a nationwide trend. She is one 304,000 girls – 19 percent of all hunters ages 6 to 15 – who took to the woods last year, almost doubling the number of girls that hunted in 1996. According to the just-released 2006 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service five-year census, four times as many boys hunt, but their numbers have remained unchanged.

Stewart also is part of a Pennsylvania hunting surge, the survey says, in which hunting by adult males increased 7.6 percent and female participation jumped almost 10 percent, while numbers dropped 10 percent nationally in all but 20 states.

A 2005 five-year survey by the National Sporting Goods Association painted a rosier picture of female hunting participation, claiming a 72 percent increase nationwide.

“We can explain decreases in men,” said Mark Duda of Responsive Management, a Virginia firm that tracks and interprets outdoors trends. “Male hunters live in rural areas and they’re aging. As to why female participation is increasing, that’s more of a mystery, since it appears to span various age groups, incomes and levels of education.

“Something is happening with women and hunting.”

Cultural change, societal acceptance and a concerted recruitment effort by state game agencies and shooting and hunting organizations has driven the spike in female interest that began 30 years ago, flattened in the 1990s, and peaked again at the start of this century.

While the Fish and Wildlife Service says female participation is too scattered to measure in detail, Brianne represents the traditional female hunter, in that she grew up with parents who are avid about deer.

“When she was little, I’d dress her in ‘camo’ and put her in one of those jerry packs and take her along with me to the woods,” said Brianne’s mother Cathy Stewart, 43. “From the time she was old enough to flip the switch on the grinder, she’d be there when we did our butchering. I think one of the reasons she wants to hunt is she likes the taste of deer meat.”

Brianne says it goes beyond that.

“It was the excitement of, like, … my heart was pounding, my blood was racing, I was breathing heavily, I felt confident I could shoot it,” she said. “Some other kids hunt. Most other girls — my friends — they’re like, ‘Ewww!’ Most of them think it’s cruel to shoot animals. Usually, I tell them if you don’t shoot deer the population will go up too high and they’ll destroy a lot of crops.”

Putting meat on the table is, statistically, the top reason women take up arms and head to the woods, a perception corroborated by Stewart, who learned to hunt from her father.

“Although I love the woods in fall, hunting is a shopping expedition for me,” she said. “It beats going to the grocery store.”

But among women who begin hunting as adults, food gathering is secondary, according to Peggy Farrell, a hunter who runs the Becoming an Outdoors-Woman program at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. “A connection to nature is No. 1.”

Often women are nudged into hunting by close friends or relatives, and find support through mentoring programs like Farrell’s or those sponsored by the National Rifle Association, National Wild Turkey Federation and other groups that pitch hunting and shooting as family-friendly activities.

“The only way kids will get into the woods is through women, so in order to target youths, you have to target women,” said Anne Hall, 45, of Ligonier, who took up hunting three years ago at the urging of her brother-in-law, a wildlife biologist with the National Wild Turkey Federation. Most new adult hunters today are initiated through deer hunting — as opposed to small game — but Hall learned by targeting turkey through the federation’s Women in the Outdoors program. This year, she called in her first bird, hunting alone in the woods.

“It has become such a passion with me, I had no idea what I’d been missing,” said Hall, who also hunts small game and deer with her two teenage sons, her female friends, and her husband, who picked up a gun again for the first time in decades. “It’s not about the harvest,” said Hall, who recently introduced her 11-year old son to squirrel hunting through the national Families Afield campaign. “It’s about being in the outdoors, watching the woods wake up, sharing the experience.”

Whether such programs are answering a demand or creating one is hard to know, Duda said, since female hunters are still considered a niche market. But the bottom line appears to be the same: women bought up to 15 percent of the 12 million hunting licenses sold in America last year (50,000 to 100,000 in Pennsylvania) and generate $420 million in sales of guns, clothing and female-specific products including recoil reduction pads that fit onto bra straps, portable urinals, scaled-down sporting arms and camouflage apparel tailored to the female form.

“If the gun’s got too long of a stock, it would be uncomfortable to shoot and a new shooter might lose interest,” said Kevin Howard, whose Missouri-based firm handles public relations for Browning, Winchester Firearms and others in the industry. “Women want to be comfortable, and those involved in a social hunting atmosphere, like bird hunting, want clothing to be stylish, too. If you look at catalogues, you’ll see they seem to be catering to women.”

The hope is that efforts to cultivate the female market will pay off in the long term, although Fish and Wildlife retention statistics aren’t yet available, and Duda said people who start later in life are less likely to remain avid.

While 25 million people call themselves hunters, only 12 1/2 million hunt 15 to 20 days a year — the strictest definition of “avid.”

Kay Peyer, 85, of Murrysville, fits that demographic. She hasn’t missed a single deer season since she was 12 and hasn’t lost her ardor for hunting.

A retired registered nurse, Peyer learned to hunt from her father, a Pennsylvania game warden. When he died, she inherited his .300 Savage, which she took on a three-month adventure in Alaska. There, she killed a moose with one shot in the wilderness below Anchorage.

In September, she took part in the Pennsylvania Game Commission’s three-day season for youths, the elderly and the disabled, hunting with a pistol north of Kittaning.

“I’d love to have gotten a shot, but the deer just weren’t moving,” she said. “It was too warm. But it was a lovely day to be sitting in the woods.”

Deer Hunting: Work Not Done After the Shot

It’s time for on-the-ground deer management and that means taking advantage of hunting season. Three cheers to all who elected to use the days following Thanksgiving to be seated in their stands deer hunting rather than corralled with strangers outside retail stores to save a dime. Deer season’s busiest weekend dropped tons of meat all across Texas. You may have bagged a nice buck or a good-eating doe, but now what?

Hunting is a clean and simple exercise. It’s squeezing the trigger and making an accurate shot that adds time to the back end of any trip into the woods. First order of business is to field-dress the animal and, if temperatures are mild as they have been lately, cool the meat. In surprisingly short time, heat can manifest itself in a host of undesireable effects on fresh venison.

“If it’s 70 degrees outside,” said Michael Cruz, of Pete’s Fine Meats on Richmond, “I wouldn’t leave a deer (undressed) for more than an hour.”

Deer Hunting:  Work Not Done After the Shot

Handle With Care

Whether you prefer to hang your deer from trees or leave them on the ground for unzipping, be careful and patient throughout the process. Elementary as it sounds, keep the fingers of the hand that isn’t holding the knife away from the hand that is. Even with an extremely sharp blade, pressure must be applied during certain aspects of the field-dressing job, and you’ll be working in a slippery environment. Move slowly and carefully avoid a painful slice.

According to Cruz, one of the most wasteful hunter mistakes is poor field-care that contaminates good meat with other things inside the animal. There’s no need to be graphic here. If you don’t understand the message or the procedure, ask someone who does to observe and instruct.

Some things within a deer are supposed to be cut in preparing it for the professional’s blade and paper, and some are not. Confusing the two taints immediately upon contact; processors have to discard everything that’s suspect, then hack away a little more, before they can package remaining venison for consumption.

Also unnecessarily wasteful is sloppy shot placement. At a range inside 200 yards with good lighting through a properly sighted, scoped rifle, there is no reason to miss the intended mark by more than a couple of inches. I made this point in another column recently after hearing a “professional hunter” on video proclaim that we’re ready for the field when we can hit a dinner plate at 100 yards.

In addition to being woefully disrespectful to the animal, such casual marksmanship also ruins prime meat. Bullet strikes too high may rip through backstraps. Hits too far aft rupture some of those aforementioned bits and pieces that can ruin an otherwise prime piece of meat.

Incidentally, if you don’t know where to settle the crosshairs on a deer, you can learn quickly from Mike Kasberg’s Aim for Success laminated poster, just $7 plus incidentals at his Web site. I’d like to see each of his aim points lowered a couple of inches, frankly, but cannot argue with the placements so long as the bullet hits where the rifle is pointed.

Cool It Down

For the sake of argument here, we’ll presume a clean shot and prompt, careful field dressing. Next logical stop for most hunters would be the processor, but Cruz suggested otherwise.

“Once it’s gutted out, put it on ice right away and keep it there for a couple of days,” Cruz said. “Let it bleed out. That keeps the meat tender and nice and colorful.”

Hanging a deer in a cooler for the same length of time before processing, said Cruz, who has 46 years in the meat business, tends to dry it out.

Texas hunters have the option on most ranches of adding a wild hog to the meat locker. Same ranch, same temperature — but different strategy.

“With hogs, you want to do everything (in the field) in about half the time as for deer,” Cruz said. The “other white meat” apparently is that much more fragile than venison.

Larger hogs produce bigger, thicker chops, said Cruz, which some hunters prefer, but the meat of a smaller pig is more tender and a better complement to venison when mixed in sausage. Of equal size, sows make better eating than boars.

Basic cutting and wrapping for deer and hogs costs less than $50 at Pete’s, but extra services and special processing, such as smoking the meat or having some of it made into jerky, can jack up a tab in a hurry. Wherever you process your venison and wild pork, be sure to ask in advance exactly how much you’ll pay for what you want.

Texas deer hunters have much to be thankful for this time of year. A herd of nearly 4 million whitetails comes to mind, as do winters cool enough to keep venison from spoiling quickly but not so cold as to be bitterly uncomfortable while we wait for a big buck to step clear. Read about sausage making tips.

Doug Pike covers the outdoors for the Houston Chronicle and hosts Inside the Outdoors from 6-9 a.m. Saturdays on 790 AM. doug.pike@chron.com