<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ecological Impacts of Supplemental Feeding of Deer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buckmanager.com/2008/03/26/ecological-impact-of-supplemental-feeding-of-deer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buckmanager.com/2008/03/26/ecological-impact-of-supplemental-feeding-of-deer/</link>
	<description>Deer Hunting and Habitat Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:32:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buck Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.buckmanager.com/2008/03/26/ecological-impact-of-supplemental-feeding-of-deer/comment-page-1/#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 17:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buckmanager.com/2008/03/26/ecological-impact-of-supplemental-feeding-of-deer/#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>Hey Caroline TC, thanks for visiting the site. First, deer overpopulation is an issue, but not in many areas where deer can be legally hunted. I don&#039;t blame hunters or deer for vehicular accidents, but obviously in areas where deer do over-populate, such as in areas where they can not be legally hunted, there are many deer/auto collisons caused by hunters and mostly non-hunters (since only about 10% of people hunt.)

Also, with regards to birth control and deer management, birth control is not effective in free-range populations. Does must ingest the BC everday and that can not be guaranteed in the wild. Also, who is going to pay for the BC? In Texas, we have 2 million whitetail does--that&#039;s a lot of pills! Hunters foot the bill for wildlife management for both game and non-game species.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Caroline TC, thanks for visiting the site. First, deer overpopulation is an issue, but not in many areas where deer can be legally hunted. I don&#8217;t blame hunters or deer for vehicular accidents, but obviously in areas where deer do over-populate, such as in areas where they can not be legally hunted, there are many deer/auto collisons caused by hunters and mostly non-hunters (since only about 10% of people hunt.)</p>
<p>Also, with regards to birth control and deer management, birth control is not effective in free-range populations. Does must ingest the BC everday and that can not be guaranteed in the wild. Also, who is going to pay for the BC? In Texas, we have 2 million whitetail does&#8211;that&#8217;s a lot of pills! Hunters foot the bill for wildlife management for both game and non-game species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarolineTC</title>
		<link>http://www.buckmanager.com/2008/03/26/ecological-impact-of-supplemental-feeding-of-deer/comment-page-1/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>CarolineTC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buckmanager.com/2008/03/26/ecological-impact-of-supplemental-feeding-of-deer/#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>You are all &quot;worried&quot; about deer overpopulation and deer vehicle accident, but you reject the deer birth control even knowing it works and its safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are all &#8220;worried&#8221; about deer overpopulation and deer vehicle accident, but you reject the deer birth control even knowing it works and its safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
